Rollo writes in his most recent Substack blog “Moralists lose the narrative in the solutions they feel should follow the Red Pill analysis. This is always the part of the assessment where they say something like, “The Red Pill gets some things right…” quickly followed by, “But they have no solutions…” That’s because the Red Pill isn’t concerned with advice, solutions, or best practices.”
If the Red Pill isn’t concerned with giving advice, providing solutions, or defining best practices, then why did Rollo write the nine Iron Rules of Tomassi? I think many would agree that those nine rules can be considered best practices or advice.
How about when any RP content creator tells men to not get married or when Myron made his 50 bodies before getting married statement? All that sounds like advice to me.
I think with understanding information that the Red Pill provides you are more equipped with being able to subdue feminism or completely eradicate it from our culture. But the question that seems to leave me confused and wondering is: why do the Red Pill content creators have a problem in providing advice, solutions, or best practices only for marriage/ family creation? For example, how many creators advise men to not get into relationships with single mothers? That is providing advice or best practice. Or “never under any circumstance live with the woman you aren’t married to or are not planning to marry within six months”- it’s advice. (Rollo, The Rational Male) Myron Gains: “don’t settle down with the woman until you have 50 bodies” – also advice. But when it comes to family creation or saving the nuclear family, they are not providing solutions, advice or best practices. They are not promoting marriage. Who else is not offering solutions to save marriage? The feminists.
It begs the question if RP is not feminism for men, but it still chooses not to fight against feminism, is that because RP may be benefiting from the promiscuity of women’s behavior that feminism encourages?
Just look at the most popular Red Pill shows such as Fresh and Fit. Whatever Podcast and Access Vegas. All three of those shows are widely popular, and they all have a very common theme. They all bring on sex workers of some sort, whether that is porn stars, Only Fans content creators, or WebCam thots. The more promiscuous the women are, the more likely they will receive super chats from fans watching. It’s as if they are bringing these promiscuous women onto the show to farm super chat from their audience. Either way they’re basically pimping out these prostitutes virtually to gain more revenue from them.
I have very rarely seen any marriageable women on these podcasts to show some form of contrast between the promiscuous Internet sluts and women who would be a better choice for long term relationships.
Why don’t they promote women who have morals and values that would support the nuclear family? What benefit do they gain from only showing non-marriageable promiscuous women?
Say what you want to say about Fresh and Fit, but at least Myron and Walter are the only guys that really call out women for their promiscuous lifestyle and the consequences that their promiscuous behavior is going to have on women in the future. They tell women what men expect from women. They tell these women the harsh truth, so that women can adjust their lifestyle. I have spoken to a few women who after talking to Myron and Walter changed their life after living the feminist lie. And these women are grateful for guys’ honesty. So, we can conclude that at least this show has made some positive impact on women.
In the end, I’m still left confused about how the Red Pill content creators who seem to provide solutions, advice and best practices to men who only want to capitalize from the degenerate behavior of women. Any Red Pill aware content creator that tries to use information that Red Pill provides (facts and descriptions) to come up with solutions for the problems men are facing when it comes to marriage and family creation are quickly reminded that the Red Pill does not provide solutions, advice or best practices (prescriptions).
Rollo predicted last year that we would soon not recognize the Red Pill as we know it. I believe his statement is true. I believe that the Red Pill will split into two groups: one group will continue to embrace and adapt to feminism in order to benefit from women’s unchecked promiscuity while the other group will be focused on solving the problems men experience from feminism.
Great article, Glenn! ❤️👏🔥🙏 Really enjoyed reading it. 🤩🙏
Don't you think it's great to draw a line between RP and the advice that RP aware creators give?
RP := Facts / Stats about intersectional dynamics in modern days
That's why it's "RP aware" and not plainly "RP". They are aware of the RP, they are not representing it. They are presenting it for sure.
For me, that definition makes more sense to identify myself. I am RP aware. I am not in favor of the latest trends of advice. Furthermore, I might not even be aware of those.
Indeed, it would make things confusing to push for other definitions of the RP that include the advice. That would make it a living definition instead of just a definition referencing living stats. Don't make RP a useless definition like that, similar to "feminism". Nobody can tell what a "feminist" is nowadays... We already got a term for the broader spectrum, including advice: Manosphere.
I don't get the need to butcher the definition. It seems to me that it's done for two reasons: 1. To weaken the RP legitimacy and try to make it seem laughable, and 2. To use a "cool" term for addressing those specific handful of creators and be perceived more of an expert.
In my opinion, it's a little much to ask of those creators to keep their advice to themselves to keep the RP definition pure. Especially, considering that you can't tell people how the world works without telling them how to feel about it.
So, while we need creators to utilize giving advice to become popular, there is nothing wrong with differentiating the advice from the theory. Why all the backlash on this?
If I'm a Christian (maybe even a representative one) and I tell people it enhances one's connection with God to give a dollar to every third beggar I encounter, that doesn't make that advice a part of Christianity.